Classically we treat the baseline speed of the universe as zero. What happens if we re-orient our perception to a baseline—fitting for a holographic universe—that is the speed of light?
Let’s say light’s speed is the baseline. We can condense light’s speed all the way down to zero, but it’s a dark-energy zero that wants to expand. We can expand light’s speed all the way out to zero, but it’s a dark-matter zero that wants to contract. In the former, the slingshot is drawn all the way back. In the latter, the slingshot is sprung all the way forward.
The baseline is like sea level or sunset. If I am below sea level, it may look as if time is slowing down (collapsing). If I am above sea level, it may look as if time is speeding up (exploding).
We have been treating the speed of light as a simple number—the color green. I believe it can be a simple number (“2D”); but it can also be a complex number—blue + yellow.
Is what we observe light as itself—light qua light? Or are we seeing light’s derivatives? Light as light may be likened to a rose that decays at the same rate we do; we do not see time when we are one with its speed.
When we observe a rose decay via time-lapse, it is like when we observe sun rise and sun set. The speed is accelerated.
We can see the sun rise and set because its circadian rhythm is faster than ours. There may be a yet wider lens for whom our rising and setting appears as “sun.” I believe that wider lens is the black hole.
The middle ring can see the movement of the smaller ring. But can it perceive the movement of the wider ring? Perhaps it can only perceive the movement of the wider ring gradually, in increments. To fully observe the wider ring, we must be wider than it.
In a holographic universe, perhaps the optimum background is the speed of light. When the background is too cold, light has to be too fast (sun). When the background is too hot, light has to be too cold (moon).
In cancer, we see only the increased rate of replication (the foreground); we don’t see that time is too slow (the background). If the dopamine burn rate is too high, we may experience dopamine surfeit and dopamine deficiency at the same time. We are deficient in dopamine because we are using too much dopamine.
If we treat the baseline as sea level, perhaps, instead of being under water, it’s as if the cancerous cell is “under light.” This model treats the body—the universe—as a kind of hydraulic system. Only, instead of water, it’s light.
