I am suggesting we orient ourselves to the universe in a novel way; that we see reality as emerging from 2D, and treat light as a 2D plane. When viewed from below, we call it sun. When viewed from above, we call it moon. I have been strongly influenced by Donald Hoffman, Anil Seth, and many others working in cognitive science and neuroscience.
In contrast to classical models, this model does not treat reality as necessarily an inertial field. The field can be inertial, but it does not need to be. It depends on the proton gradient.
When the proton gradient is too high, there is efflux. When the proton gradient is too low, there is influx.
I may present to you as inertial. But if the background against which I exist is condensing, I am exploding (Parkinson’s?).
I may present to you as inertial. But if the background against which I exist is exploding, I am condensing (ALS?).
In these models, only at the speed of light is the background inertial.
The reality we perceive with our senses could be emerging from 2D. If we make a 2D plane our baseline, we can establish a new axis that runs perpendicular to it: time. If I draw behind the baseline, I am denser than light. But light cannot be denser than light and be stable. When it is behind the baseline by a full degree of light’s speed, electricity emerges. If I spring beyond the baseline, I am more diffuse than light. But light cannot be more diffuse than light and be stable. When it expands beyond the baseline by a full degree of light’s speed, gravity emerges.
Could Our Universe Be 2-Dimensional? Black Holes Offer A Clue
MIT Technology Review: https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/06/20/102942/life-could-exists-in-a-2d-universe-according-to-physics-anyway/
Life could exist in a 2D universe (according to physics, anyway)
