Light’s Speed as 2D Boundary

I am suggesting we orient ourselves to the universe in a novel way; that we see reality as emerging from 2D, and treat light as a 2D plane. When viewed from below, we call it sun. When viewed from above, we call it moon. I have been strongly influenced by Donald Hoffman; our brains create the images we see. I treat celestial bodies as perceptual limits.

The 2D plane is light as itself, light qua light.

Below the plane—below the sun, below “Alpha”—is not light. It is dark matter.

Above the plane—above the moon, above “Omega”—is not light. It is dark energy.

We are used to dividing circadian rhythm into two options. Below the sun—”day.” Above the moon—”night.” I am suggesting there is a third option. In the thin envelope above the sun and below the moon is light itself.

In contrast to classical models, this model does not treat reality necessarily as an inertial field. It can be inertial, but it does not need to be. It depends on the proton gradient.

When the proton gradient is too high inside the cell, there is efflux. When the proton gradient is too high outside the cell, there is influx.

I may present to you as inertial. But if the background against which I exist is condensing, I am exploding (Parkinson’s?).

I may present to you as inertial. But if the background against which I exist is exploding, I am condensing (ALS?).

In these models, only at the speed of light is the background against which I exist inertial.

The reality we perceive with our senses could be emerging from 2D. If we make a 2D plane our baseline, we can establish a new axis that runs perpendicular to it: time. If I draw behind the baseline, I am denser than light. But light cannot be stable and be denser than light. When it is behind the baseline by a full degree of light’s speed, electricity emerges. If I spring beyond the baseline, I am more diffuse than light. But light cannot be stable and be more diffuse than light. When it expands beyond the baseline by a full degree of light’s speed, gravity emerges.

https://www.forbes.com/sites/fernandezelizabeth/2020/01/21/could-our-universe-be-2-dimensional-black-holes-offer-a-clue/

Could Our Universe Be 2-Dimensional? Black Holes Offer A Clue

MIT Technology Review: https://www.technologyreview.com/2019/06/20/102942/life-could-exists-in-a-2d-universe-according-to-physics-anyway/

Life could exist in a 2D universe (according to physics, anyway)

Physicists and philosophers have long claimed that life can form only in a universe like ours, with three dimensions of space and one of time. That thinking may need to be revised.
Posted in

alethea