This model does not treat time as linear. In this model, all days are happening every day.
Each day has three varieties of observer. It can be viewed from behind itself, as itself, or in front of itself.
We can view the color green as the color green. Or we can view green from a “yellow” position (which will make it appear more blue). Or from a “blue” position (which will make it appear more yellow).
Perhaps pH7, too, will read differently to a brain that is too acidic or too alkaline. But how can I tell?
What I am perceiving might be true pH7, akin to perceiving water as water. But might it also be vapor condensing—vapor against a cold background? Or ice melting—ice against a hot background? This is not a static universe.
We do not, at present, treat illness as having a “foreground” and “background” value. Perhaps we should.
A child presents as hyperactive. Perhaps he is actually hypo-active—this might explain why stimulants such as Ritalin are sometimes prescribed for hyperactivity. We might not see the underlying dysfunction. We could see what the body does to fix it.
Could this truly be a holographic universe, as predicted by Leonard Susskind, Stephen Hawking, Juan Maldacena, Gerard ‘t Hooft, and many others? Perhaps light, like time, has three varieties of observer.
What we see could be light as itself—light qua light. But it could also be energy that is cooling (fusing). Or matter that is heating (splitting). However, when energy cools to light, or matter heats to light, do the number of worlds (see the Many Worlds Theory of Quantum Mechanics) remain the same?
Parkinson’s: I am too hot (hyper-methylating), so the world looks too cold. Now I am trapped. How can I slow down when the world is already too cold? Slow + cold will be less than the speed of light.
ALS: I am too cold (hypo-methylating), so the world looks too hot. Now I am trapped. How can I speed up when the world is already too hot? Fast + hot will be greater than the speed of light.
This issue of a foreground and a background might prevent us from seeing the truth, or create a kind of paradox. If I am going to spin at a hot speed, that which is spinning had better be cold. If I am going to spin at a cold speed, that which is spinning had better be hot. Because of this “net” effect, what we see might be the opposite of what it actually is.
